MARINE REVIEW. | II INTERNATIONAL ENGINEERING CONGRESS. Assemblage of engineers from all parts of the world--A full report of the several sessions of the branch devoted to marine and naval engineering and naval architecture. Nearly every civilized nation was represented at the Inter- national Engineering Congress held at the Art Palace on the lake front in Chicago last week, and the assemblage of engineers, which has been looked to for some time past as one of the features of the World's Columbian Exposition, was truly the greatest ever witnessed in the world. As readers of the REVIEW are most interested in the proceedings of the division: of marine and naval engineering and naval architecture, this account will be confined to the proceedings in that division, although it will be necessary to refer briefly to the opening general session of all the divisions. The Hon. C. C. Bonney, president of the World's Congress Auxiliary, delivered an address of welcome, which was echoed by Mr. Octave Chanute, first vice chairman of the general com- mittee of the International Engineering Congress. Addresses were also made by Sir Benjamin Baker of England, builder of the Forth bridge, Baron Quinette de Rochemont of France, C. O. Gleim of Germany, and several other distinguished foreigners, and also by the chairmen of the. different divisions of the con- gress, namely: Mr. William Metcalf, division A, civil engineer- ing; Mr. Eckley B. Coxe, division B, mechanical engineering ; E. G. Spilsbury, division C, mining engineering; Henry M. Howe, division D, metallurgical engineering; Prof. Ira O. Baker, division EK, engineering education; Major Clifton Comly, U. S. A., division F, military engineering, and Commodore Geo. W. Melville, U. S. N., division G, marine and naval engineering and naval architecture. The general meeting then adjourned and the seven divisions of the congress opened sessions imme- diately afterward in the various halls. MARINE AND NAVAL ENGINEERING AND NAVAL ARCHITECTURE. About forty-five papers from the most distinguished repre- sentatives of the ship building industry in Great Britain, France, Germany, Spain, Italy and the United States were contributed to the division of marine and naval engineering and naval archi- tecture, and thirty-three of them were in print, while less than half a dozen of the whole number of papers put down on the programme failed of appearance. The foreign attendance was more than equal to that in other branches, and was fully up to what was expected in consideration of the diversified interests represented in the general congiess. Among the eminent gentlemen in attendance at this branch of the congress may be mentioned General IL. de Bussy, inspecteur general du genie maritime of France; Dr. Francis Elgar of London, vice president of the Institution of Naval Architects and delegate from that in- stitution to this congress; Colonel Nabor Soliani, of the corps del genio navale of Italy; Professor Carl Busley of the Imperial German Naval Academy at Kiel, Germany; Antonio de Barron Boneto of the Brazilian navy; Mr. James Howden of Glasgow, inventor of Howden's system of forced draft; Commodore Mel- ville, engineer-in-chief U. S. N., chairman of the division; Passed Assistant Engineer McFarland, secretary of the division; Com- modore Charles H. Loring, U.S. N., formerly engineer-in-chief of the navy; Geo. W. Dickie, Esq., manager of the Union Iron Works, San Francisco; Warren E. Hill, Esq., vice president of the Continental Iron Works, Brooklyn, N. Y.; Naval Constructor Varney, U. S. N.; Geo. W. Street, assistant constructor U. S. N.; Chief Engineer Moore of the navy; Chief Engineer David Smith, U. S. N.; Prof. W. F. Durand of Cornell University, Ithica, N. Y.; Prof. Ira N. Hollis of Harvard University; Prof. W. F. Spangler of the University of Pennsyivania; Col. E. A. Stevens, superintendent of the Hoboken Ferry Boat Company, New York; T. A. McElwell, Esq., superintendent of the Vacuum Oil Company, Rochester, N. Y.; Charles Ward, Esq., inventor of the Ward water tube boiler, Charleston, W. Va.; Edward E. Roberts of the Roberts Water Tube Boiler Company; H. B. Roelker, Esq., of No. 41 Maiden Lane, New York, proprietor of the Allen dense air ice machine; Charles W. Whitney of New York City; Charles A. Moore of the well-known firm of Manning, Maxwell & Moore, Liberty street, New York; Asa M. Mattice, consulting engineer of Cambridgeport, Mass.; Col. David P. Jones, chief engineer U.S. N., retired; John M. Sweeny of Harvey, Ill.; Count de Balincourt of the French navy; Passed Assistant Frank M. Bennett, U.S. N ; Chief Engineer John L. D. Bortherwick, U.S. N.; Mr. J. R. Williams, mechanical engi- neer, No. 60 South Canal street, Chicago; Prof. John Pemberton, U.S. N., associate professor of mechanical engineering, Pennsyl- vania State College; Capt. Charles H. Manning, superintendent of the Amoskeag Mills, Manchester, N. H.; C. B. Calder, super- intending engineer of the Mutual and Menominee steamboat lines, Cleveland: Joseph McMakin, superintending engineer Columbian Iron Works, Baltimore; Chief Engineer Kafer, U. S. N.; Mr. F. W. Grogan, architect of the naval exhibit of the World's Columbian Exposition; E. Platt Stratton, chief engineer surveyor, Record of American and Foreign Shipping, New York; Mr. Frank B. King, superintendent of the marine department. Maryland Steel Company, Sparrow's Point, Md.; Joseph R. Old- ham, naval architect, Cleveland; Charles KE. Fitch, No. 296 Elm street, Chicago; Alfred H. Raynal, Elizabeth, N. J,; HK. N. Jansen, bureau of steam engineering, navy department; P. A. Lennerty, mechanical engineer and naval architect; A. George Mattson, constructing engineer S. F. Hodge & Co., Detroit, Mich.; Henry C. Meyer, Jr., of the Engineering Record, No. 227 Pearl street, New York; Frank M. Dunlap, mechanical engineer, No. 57 Selden avenue, Detroit, Mich.; Theodore G. Hoech, royal Prussian inspector of waterways; D. W. Edenston of Clinton, Ill.; E. T'.Sederholm, No. 1629 Fulton street, Chicago; Mr. Hay- den Homer Tracy and S. D. Boynton. DISCUSSION OF PAPERS. The first session began with an address by Commodore Melville, in which he expressed gratification at the large attend- ance, and welcomed the.foreign guests. _ He then gave a brief summary of the present condition of matters connected with marine engineering and naval architecture, and sketched briefly the lines along which future progress will probably be made, calling special attention to the fact that it will most likely be on about the same lines as in the past, which have consisted of an increase of steam pressure, an increase of piston speed, better material and, possibly, changes in design to a certain extent. He mentioned that experiments are now being made with steam of 1,200 pounds pressure, and called attention to the possibili- ties of the coil boiler for enabling great power to be obtained with little weight. He also mentioned in the course of his remarks the death of Dr. Alexander C. Kirk, a member of the advisory council of the division, who had begun a paper on the triple expansion engine, and on which he was engaged at the time of his death. The first paper was by Sir Nathaniel Barnaby of England on "The Best Ship of War." 'This was a paper worthy of its eminent author and in brief compass contained the results of the experience of that eminent architect. This paper was dis- cussed by Dr. Francis Elgar of England, Chief Engineer Kafer, _of the U. S. N., Professor Durand of Cornell University, Naval Constructor Varney, U. S. N., and several others. Other papers were by Mr. Lewis Nixon, superintending architect of Wm. Cramp & Sons Ship and Engine Building Company of. Philadelphia on " The New Vessels of the United States Navy,"' and " Naval Architecture in the United States"? by Benjamin